The laws of unintended consequences and collateral damage apply to criminals just like they do anyone else.Â Iâd like to give some examples of âcrimesâ that might have the judge and jury shedding tearsâones of laughter.
A driver went to the trouble to find a replica of testicles. He displayed them in the back of his truck. The sheriffâs deputy stopped him and gave him a ticket. The motorist is back in the news. Heâs got a second ticket for the same âcrimeâ. One more time and that is three strikes and heâs out. A life sentence in a South Carolina prison where a set of replica testicles might not work out all that well for him.
A drunk driver had his truck pulled over early on a Thursday morning by the police. Heâd been clocked doing 70 mph around midnight. His companion who was riding shotgun was a âsmall monkeyâ. The police seized the truck and monkey and arrested the driver whoâd had a history of DUI arrests. No word on how much the monkey had drunk.
A 17-year-old biker made a point of giving the finger to one of those CCTV cameras that monitor the traffic. Not once but 26 times. He cleverly covered his face and removed his license plate. The police laid a trap for him at the end of a tunnel and the biker confessed to crime of displaying his middle finger at the CCTV camera.
It wouldnât be a good German crime story with out further evidence that comes from a strong scientific background and understanding of procedures, permits and technology. It turns out the biker had the wrong license for the bike he was caught in carrying out his crime. No middle finger usage endorsed on the license. And the police technical expert said the 125cc bike was âillegalâ based on his assessment, allowing the police to confiscate it. The biker was fined, points deducted and banned for 26 months from driving. One month for every time he flipped the bird.
A fifty-year-old policeman was arrested after he approached a 25-year-old woman in a restaurant.Â He crept up on her and began to lick her hair. The cop was attached a forensic unit and had been on a medical leave. The authorities were certain when the cop would return to work, or what crime, if any, to charge the hair licking forensic cop.
One difficulty of being an identical twin is if your criminally inclined brother commits a criminal act, flees the scene and leaves you to take the heat as the witnesses identify you as the bad guy. Back in November 2010, Anek Ounwong had a fight with a group of teenagers and he used a grass cutter in what sounds like a bonsai attack on them. Anek, as often happens in these circumstances, didnât stick around and headed for the hills. Last week he went home to find that his brother had received a four-year prison term of the grass cutter attack. The brother had tried to explain to the police that it wasnât him. The police refused to buy his âI am a twin and my evil brother did itâ story as did the trial and appellate courts. Now Anek is back in town, heâs gone to the police and confessed he was the attacker.
What was the reaction of the police? âItâs out of our hands. We can do nothing.â But the police suggested a course of action. Anek might want to petition the prosecutorâs office or the courts and explain to them what had happened.
As cases are known to move through the Thai criminal justice at a vast speed, it takes about four years before there is a final outcomeâjust the right amount of time for the innocent brother to get out of prison. Then the prosecutor can launch a new criminal case against the twin who committed the crime.Â I doubt Anek will be able to claim credit for the time served by his brother. Though he might try. No doubt the authorities will adjust criminal statistics on assaults with a glass cutter which might well half the number of cases for 2010.
What these and many similar cases show is the role of bad luck, bad companions, bad brother, and hair licking police in the day-to-day criminal cases that happen right around the world.
Christopher G. Mooreâs latest book is Faking It in Bangkok.